In a groundbreaking legal move, The New York Times (N.Y. Times) has taken a stand against technology companies OpenAI and Microsoft. The allegation? The use of millions of N.Y. Times articles without permission to train A.I. chatbots.
Are OpenAI and Microsoft Infringing on N.Y. Times' Content?
The role of OpenAI in this controversy is no small part. Known for its highly praised A.I. platform, ChatGPT, OpenAI is in the crosshairs of the first legal dispute launched against it by a large U.S. media organization. Microsoft, who had invested in OpenAI, is also under fire for contributing to developing A.I. platforms, one of them named Copilot.
OpenAI and Microsoft find themselves in a growing pool of companies facing backlash. Writers and content creators continue to take a legal stand against the automatic collection of data- commonly known as "scraping" by A.I. services, mainly when this scraping occurs without compensation.
ALSO READ: Federal Appeals Court Throws-Out Fortenberry Lying Conviction, Flags Mistake in Trial Jurisdiction
Can 'Free-Riding' on Journalism Work Be Justified?
The grey area arose when OpenAI and Microsoft allegedly used the N.Y. Times' vast journalistic content as a stepping stone for their purposes. The Manhattan federal court received a detailed complaint from the N.Y. Times claiming that the tech companies were seeking a "free-ride" on the coattails of the newspaper's prodigious investment in quality journalism, aiming to deliver alternative content to readers.
The NY Times unyieldingly states that this attempt to utilize their content without payment to create products that directly compete and lure audiences away from their site is in no way 'transformative'- a term often implicated in cases dealing with copyrights and fair use.
OpenAI and Microsoft have countered this argument by suggesting that exploiting copyrighted works for training A.I. products is considered "fair use" - a legal concept that governs copying copyrighted material without acquiring a license.
On its website, the U.S. Copyright Office clarifies that 'transformative' uses, typically regarded as fair, add something new with a different purpose or character to the original content.
What Could Be the Potential Impact?
While not demanding a specific sum, the N.Y. Times has hinted at billions of dollars as a rough estimate of the damages. The newspaper also requires that OpenAI and Microsoft do away with chatbot models and training sets that incorporate their material.
This preliminary action underlines the significance of seeking legal help and establishes a precedence for similar copyright disputes, especially in the fast-paced technology sector. By acting as an informed guide, a lawyer can illuminate the way, equipping you with an understanding of the legal system and its implications.
If you or your organization ever find yourself sailing in similar unchartered legal waters, remember that professional legal assistance is crucial. Understanding your rights is critical in an environment where intellectual property can be exploited with a click. Don't wait for the storm; reach out to a legal expert today.
RELATED TOPIC: Microsoft and OpenAI Sued by Pulitzer Prize-Winning Authors for Copyright Infringement
© 2023 Lawyer Herald All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.
Get the Most Popular Lawyerherald Stories in a Weekly Newsletter
Join the Discussion
