Judge reject Apple's bid to show Samsung patent infringement in trial

By

The second US trial between the top smartphone makers in the world has gotten of to a very tense start when US District Judge Lucy Koh in San Jose, California yesterday rejected Apple Inc's bid to show the jury how Samsung Electronics Co had been using three of the five patents that is currently being disputed in the case. Bloomberg said Koh's rejection followed after the South Korea mobile giant insisted that Apple is not using the intellectual property.

Lawyer John Quinn for Samsung told the jury in opening arguments on April 1 that Apple's lawsuit against them is actually an attack on Google Inc in disguise. Samsung is known user of the search engine company's Android operating system across all of its phones, Bloomberg said. Samsung claimed that Apple exaggerated on the extent of the damage it allegedly received from the supposed copying of its patent functions.

A court filing quoted Quinn, who told the jurors, "Apple admits that three of the five patent claims that it is suing on were not in that iPhone and have never been in any iPhone since. Apple doesn't consider it valuable enough to even use."

On the same day, Apple presented evidence and arguments mostly from its 2012 case in the hopes of convincing the jury that Samsung had infringed six of its patents, Bloomberg said. This time, however, Apple insisted that it is now 10 Samsung products, which include the Galaxy S3 phone, that has infringe five of its patents. Samsung, on its end, argued that nine of Apple's products, which include iPhone 5, iPad and iPod versions, had infringed two of its patents. According to another court filing, Samsung is seeking around $7 million in damages.

Lawyer Harold McElhinny told the jury in his April 1 opening argument that Samsung and not Google made the decision to illegally copy features to be able to sell over 37 million mobile phones and tablets.

Bloomberg said testimony is set to continue today with Samsung cross-examining Apple's senior vice president of product marketing Philip Schiller, who is a confidant of founder Steve Jobs.

Tags
Apple Inc, Samsung Electronics Co, Apple patent infringement case

© 2026 Lawyer Herald All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.

Join the Discussion
More Business
QNET

QNET's Decade in Indian Courts: From Supreme Court Stay to 2025 Defamation Victory

Matthew Fornaro

Building Strong Businesses Through Proactive Legal Planning

Jeff Kaliel Illustrates How Transparency Protects Businesses from Litigation

Jeff Kaliel Illustrates How Transparency Protects Businesses from Litigation and Builds Long-Term Customer Trust

Legacy Professionals LLP Explains How CPA Firms Help Nonprofits Maintain

Legacy Professionals LLP Explains How CPA Firms Help Nonprofits Maintain Transparency and Financial Accountability