Investment banker does not have to draft fraudulent communication to be held liable for fraud, finds Supreme Court

By

The US Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that an investment banker may be held liable under 17 CFR § 240.10b-5 (Rule 10b-5) for sending fraudulent information about a potential investment even if the employee did not draft the correspondence and sent it at the behest of their boss.

In Lorenzo v. Securities and Exchange Commission the court considered of whether Lorenzo, then a director of investment banking at a brokerage firm, committed fraud when, at the request of his boss, he sent two emails to clients about an investment opportunity at a company with assets of $10 million. Lorenzo knew the real valuation of the company's assets was closer to $400,000. Lorenzo copied and pasted the information from his boss and sent the emails anyway.

Full Article

© 2025 Lawyer Herald All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.

Join the Discussion
More Law & Society
Joseph Dedvukaj

Justice from the Ground Up: How Joseph Dedvukaj Turned Immigrant Struggle into a Legal Mission for Michigan's Injured

Donald Trump Hillary Clinton

Trump CIA Chief Suggests Hillary Clinton Could Face DOJ Prosecution: 'That's Why I Made The Referrals'

Why D&O Insurance Must Be Reworded and Triggered by Consultants

Legal Minefields: Why D&O Insurance Must Be Reworded and Triggered by Consultants Independent of Insurance Brokers or Lobbyists

Jessica Gasser

No Jail for Texas Mom Accused of Medical Child Abuse in Munchausen by Proxy Case