Investment banker does not have to draft fraudulent communication to be held liable for fraud, finds Supreme Court

By

The US Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that an investment banker may be held liable under 17 CFR § 240.10b-5 (Rule 10b-5) for sending fraudulent information about a potential investment even if the employee did not draft the correspondence and sent it at the behest of their boss.

In Lorenzo v. Securities and Exchange Commission the court considered of whether Lorenzo, then a director of investment banking at a brokerage firm, committed fraud when, at the request of his boss, he sent two emails to clients about an investment opportunity at a company with assets of $10 million. Lorenzo knew the real valuation of the company's assets was closer to $400,000. Lorenzo copied and pasted the information from his boss and sent the emails anyway.

Full Article

© 2026 Lawyer Herald All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.

Join the Discussion
More Law & Society
Image generated by Gemini

Texas Drivers Blindsided by Insurance AI 'Lowball' Offers That Ignore Serious Injuries

United Nations

What Does the UN's Newest Declaration on Slavery Mean For Us?

Image generated by Gemini

Understanding Colorado's Comparative Negligence Laws and How They Impact Settlements

Why Settlement Timelines Vary in Injury Matters

Why Settlement Timelines Vary in Injury Matters