As the New York fraud trial involving former president Donald Trump reaches its pinnacle, an unexpected twist involves Allen Weisselberg, the ex-chief Financial Officer of the Trump Organization. Judge Arthur Engoron, overseeing the case, is now requesting information about possible perjury by Weisselberg.
In the civil business fraud trial presided over by Judge Engoron, the potential issue of perjury has emerged. This inquiry came in light of The New York Times report claiming that Weisselberg might have struck a plea agreement with the Manhattan District Attorney's Office in which he would confess to perjury.
Weisselberg Seat in the Hot for Possible Perjury
According to insights from the Times, Weisselberg would admit under oath that he misled the court during Trump's fraud trial in the Manhattan Supreme Court. Moreover, he's also expected to concede that he gave false testimony under oath during an interview with the office of Letitia James, the New York Attorney General.
It's crucial to note that Weisselberg hasn't been a peripheral figure. Instead, he lies at the heart of fraud accusations involving Trump, his two adult sons, and the Trump Organization executives, including Weisselberg himself. The charges cite the fraudulent inflation of Trump's net worth over years of financial documentation to secure favorable loan terms and tax breaks.
Perjury Accusations and Penalties in Play
Judge Engoron, having already ruled that the co-defendants are legally accountable for fraud, conducted the trial to determine penalties and resolve other claims of wrongdoings in the civil lawsuit initiated by Attorney General James.
Amid this, Weisselberg's previous stint at New York's infamous Rikers Island jail for pleading guilty to tax fraud resonates. This conviction was related to his professional role at the Trump Organization. Forbes magazine has also accused him of perjuring himself over his alleged ignorance of the valuation of Trump's penthouse apartment during his October testimonial in the Attorney General's civil fraud trial.
ALSO READ: SpaceX Faces California Civil Rights Department Investigation Over Sex Bias Retaliation Charges
Impact of Weisselberg's Perjury on Trial
Judge Engoron wants to know whether Weisselberg will change his stance, admitting that he lied under oath in the courtroom during the trial. If Weisselberg perjured himself, the judge has declared that he might dismiss all testimony provided by Weisselberg, whether it was presented in court or given to investigators.
The term "falsus in uno" is brought to the forefront, a legal axiom implying that if a witness lies about one issue, their credibility on all the other problems could be disputed. Judge Engoron highlighted in his email that he doesn't wish to bypass anything in such a significant case.
In a quest for further clarity, the judge has requested the lawyers representing Trump, his accomplices, and the Attorney General's office to submit a letter detailing anything they know that won't breach professional ethics or obligations.
With the trial moving swiftly towards its verdict, these latest developments involving Weisselberg potentially perjuring himself add another layer of intrigue to the high-profile case. Lawyers for Weisselberg and other defendants in the case and spokespeople for Attorney General James and the Manhattan D.A.'s office have yet to respond. In the upcoming weeks, Judge Engoron, who conducted the trial sans jury, is expected to issue his verdict. This decision could leave lasting marks on the ex-president and his business empire.
RELATED TOPIC: No Presidential Immunity for Trump in 2020 Election Interference Case, DC Appeals Court Rules
© 2023 Lawyer Herald All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.
Get the Most Popular Lawyerherald Stories in a Weekly Newsletter
Join the Discussion
