In a surprising twist of events, a federal judge has ruled against X, previously known as Twitter, on a lawsuit concerning unpaid bonuses. Staff accused their employer, X, of neglecting to honor their commitment to a bonus payment. This led the judge to reject X's attempt to dismiss the case on Friday.
Was the Promise of Paying Bonuses only Verbal?
The issue stems from allegations that X failed to meet bonus payment obligations after its acquisition by billionaire Elon Musk in October 2022. The company had given repeated assurances - orally - to its workforce, both before and after this pivotal deal, according to a lawsuit filed in June 2023.
This grave accusation was instigated by Mark Schobinger, formerly a senior director of compensation at X. He filed the suit in a San Francisco federal court after he departed from the company in May. The case is now vying for class-action status for any past and present employees of X who were allegedly denied their 2022 bonuses.
ALSO READ: Federal Labor Agency Probes Wage Theft Claims, Labor Violations in NY State Education Department
Just How Legally Binding Can Oral Promises Be?
US District Judge Vince Chhabria announced last week that Schobinger's case against X seemed credible and advanced its hearing. He declared, "Twitter's offer to pay him a bonus in return became a binding contract under California law."
Interestingly, X, once a key player in the field of public relations, chose not to comment on CNN's request for input on this matter. Their previous stance centered around the argument that oral promises aren't legally binding. They suggested the case should be shifted to Texas for a hearing, but Judge Chhabria firmly stated that California law prevails in matters of contractual enforcement.
This case has arisen after numerous employees raised questions about their compensation post-Musk acquisition, especially concerning their annual bonus.
Did X Fallback on Promised Bonuses?
In the months leading up to the acquisition, X executives constantly reassured employees that 2022 bonuses would be paid at 50% of the target, as stated in the complaint. The narrative continued along the same lines after Musk took over.
However, these repeated promises sadly didn't translate into the actual payment of bonuses, claims the lawsuit. Schobinger's departure from X in May was reportedly a result of several unfulfilled promises, including the failure to deliver on promised bonuses.
Legal Help: The Way Forward
This case underscores the criticality of getting legal help from experienced lawyers when companies don't fulfill their compensation commitments. An unmet promise could translate to significant losses for the employees who have banked on these promises financially. Furthermore, it emphasizes the legality of oral promises in a contractual scenario, potentially setting a precedent for similar future disputes.
If you've faced such a situation personally, seek legal advice now. It's never too late to stand up for your rights because oral or written promises must be honored.
RELATED TOPIC: Need Help with Workplace Disputes? Why An Employment Lawyer Could Be Your Best Partner
© 2023 Lawyer Herald All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.
Get the Most Popular Lawyerherald Stories in a Weekly Newsletter
Join the Discussion
