Colorado's Sanctuary Law Confronted by Douglas County Lawsuits for Breaching Public Trust, Constitution

Douglas County Challenges Sanctuary Law

April 15 marks a significant turn in the ongoing debate over sanctuary policies in Colorado. Douglas County has initiated a lawsuit against Governor Jared Polis and the state government, asserting that sanctuary laws pose risks and violate constitutional protocols. Soon after, El Paso and Mesa counties joined in support of this legal action, signifying a growing movement against the state's approach to handling individuals who are in the United States illegally.

Colorado's Stance on Immigration Enforcement

In 2019, Colorado passed House Bill 19-1124, which caused a stir. The bill bans state law enforcement from helping with federal immigration detainers. ICE issues these detainers. They ask local police to hold migrants who have committed crimes until ICE can take them. After the bill, local forces must release people post-sentence. This makes it challenging for ICE. They have to catch them in the community.

Fresh Challenges Arise with HB23-1100

The debate intensified with the introduction of HB23-1100 in 2023. This new bill takes a firmer stance by forbidding state or local governments from contracting with or funding entities operating immigration detention facilities within Colorado's borders. The state's bid to limit ICE's ability to detain both non-criminal and criminal individuals who are in the country illegally has created additional conflicts between state policies and federal immigration laws.

Sanctuary Policies, Safety versus Enforcement

Advocates of sanctuary policies argue that collaborating with federal immigration enforcement may hinder community safety, suggesting it discourages immigrants from reporting crimes due to fear of deportation. Challengers of this view point out severe cases where sanctuary laws have failed to protect the community, noting many criminals were able to evade ICE due to these policies and commit further offenses.

ALSO READ: Illegal Migrant Freed by Feds Faces Charges for Kidnapping, Sexual Assault of a 13-year-old Florida Girl

Constitutional Conflict and Public Trust

Douglas and El Paso counties emphasize that Colorado's sanctuary laws clash with Article 14 of the state's constitution, which does not recognize any authority to block local enforcement's cooperation with federal agencies. Additionally, federal law categorically prohibits any limits on communication between governmental levels of law enforcement, with the U.S. Constitution's Supremacy Clause reinforcing this mandate even if state constitutions are altered.

Call to Action for Communities

The legal challenge presented by Douglas, El Paso, and Mesa counties highlights a critical issue beyond Colorado's borders. Other states like California and Illinois have sanctuary policies, sparking a dialogue on the balance between state autonomy and federal law. This escalating debate in Colorado may inspire other jurisdictions facing similar legislative dilemmas to reassess their stance on immigration enforcement and sanctuary policies.

While plaintiffs and supporters of the lawsuit aim to restore a sense of security and order by advocating for cooperation with federal immigration laws, implications of the lawsuit's outcome extend beyond state lines. The intricate tapestry of sanctuary policies and their real-world consequences remain a key topic for communities, lawmakers, and advocates nationwide.

RELATED TOPIC: Four Countries Join Lawsuit, Argue Colorado Immigration Laws Violate US Supremacy Clause and State Provisions

Tags

Colorado's Sanctuary Law, Confronted by Douglas County Lawsuits, Breaching Public Trust, Constitution

© 2023 Lawyer Herald All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.