A fierce debate rages in Olympia as lawmakers consider a ground-breaking proposal around felons' voting rights. House Bill 2030 (HB 2030), under discussion in the State Government & Tribal Relations committee, could reset the scales of justice and democracy. If approved, people incarcerated for felony crimes in Washington prisons may regain their right to vote, serve on juries, or even run for office.
The Proposal in Focus
At the heart of HB 2030 lies the question - should those incarcerated lose their fundamental civil rights? Presently, Washington's constitution declares those convicted of "infamous crimes" - a felony that incurs state or federal imprisonment - lose these rights during their incarceration. Rep. Tarra Simmons, D-Bremerton, the bill's primary sponsor and a formerly incarcerated person herself, argues against this status quo.
Simmons believes the system is warped with bias, stating that America's prerogative to rob incarcerated individuals of their voting rights is "very much rooted in racism." She adds that "mass incarceration is an evolution of slavery" and reminds the committee that other countries uphold voting rights, regardless of criminal convictions.
Strong Opposition Stalls Progress
The bill, however, has not been free of opposition. As violent crime rates surge in Washington, Republican lawmakers assert now is not the time to entertain such a measure. Rep. Greg Cheney (R-Battle Ground) strongly condemns the bill, labeling it "absurd on its face."
In addition to opposition from Republican quarters, notably Rep. Greg Cheney, Rep. Sam Low, and Rep. Leonard Christian, concerns have been voiced by Democratic Secretary of State Steve Hobbs. Hobbs believes in "restoring the ability to vote until a person has paid their debt to society," signaling his discomfort with letting those serving felony sentences run for office.
Do We Listen To Those on the Inside?
Interestingly, some of the most heartfelt arguments in favor of this bill come from those it directly impacts - the incarcerated individuals themselves. Speaking from the Washington Corrections Center in Shelton, Charles Longshore, an incarcerated Skokomish tribal member, argued that the bill is about "righting a historical wrong."
ALSO READ: Biden's New Surveillance Protection Court: Assessing Impacts on Transatlantic Data Trade and Privacy Right
Similarly, Derrick Jones, the current president of the Black Prisoners Caucus at the WCC, underscores the bill's importance in reconnecting incarcerated individuals with society. "When a person comes into the knowledge of his social responsibility, we begin to feel connected to something greater than ourselves," says Jones.
Are We Ready For Change?
The stage is set for what could be a landmark decision, but what does this mean for those following the development beyond Washington State? For context, around 4.6 million people in the United States, including approximately 13,000 people in Washington's prisons, cannot vote due to a felony conviction. Vermont, Maine, and the District of Columbia are the only states that would allow prisoners to vote if Washington passed HB 2030.
When In Doubt, Seek Legal Guidance
As lawmakers, citizens, and stakeholders weigh in on this significant debate over HB 2030, it's crucial to comprehend how it could impact individual legal standings. This underlines the importance of seeking legal consultation from experienced, trusted sources. Yes, the legal landscape is complex and intimidating, but you don't have to navigate it alone. Contact experienced law professionals who can provide your advice, guidance, and support. Explore your options today. The right legal help can transform your future.
RELATED TOPIC: Democratic Lawmakers Introduce Historic Bill to Reinstate Voting Rights for US Incarcerated Citizens
© 2023 Lawyer Herald All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.
Get the Most Popular Lawyerherald Stories in a Weekly Newsletter
Join the Discussion
