German group rejects Investment Court System for trade deal disputes

By

The German Magistrates Association, or DRB, did not approve the European Commission's 'Investment Court System' proposal wherein firms can file a lawsuit against governments in the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, or TTIP. The judges and prosecutors of the German association claimed that the court system proposal was not necessary nor was there a legal basis for its establishment.

The TTIP is a bilateral trade agreement between the U.S. and the European Union, reported The Independent. The trade involves easing up policies for exchange of various goods between countries included in both regions. The policies also cover other regulatory aspects such as safety laws, environmental laws and banking regulations.

The proposed Investment Court System would allow multinational companies to take governments to court as an avenue if these companies allege that a government hindered their investment opportunities, Sputnik News reported Feb. 3. The latest proposal replaced the Investor State Dispute Settlement, which was rejected by various nation regulators as well.

Opponents of the proposed system said that this court might push governments to defend their position by using consumer protections rights and environmental standards to counter companies'claims, the EU Observer reported. The DRB, who opposed the system, said the system has no factual basis, and that national courts are enough to settle potential lawsuits.

"The clearly implied assumption in the proposal for an International Investment Court, that the courts of the EU Member States fail to grant foreign investors effective judicial protection, lacks factual basis," said the DRB in a statement, as cited by Sputnik News. The group reasoned that any potential legal disputes should have been tackled when the TTIP was being set.

"Only in this way can the full legal rights to which any law-seeking party in Germany and the European Union is entitled, be guaranteed. The creation of special courts for certain groups of litigants is the wrong way forward," the group added.

Tags
European Union, European Commission

© 2025 Lawyer Herald All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.

Join the Discussion
More Law & Society
Texas Floods Kill Over 100 as New Rain Threatens Hard-Hit Communities

Flooded Texas County Turned Down Funds for Warning System From Biden Admin in 2021: 'We Don't Want to Be Bought'

Donald Trump and Tom Homan

Border Czar Declares 'Physical Appearance' Is Enough for ICE to Detain and Question: 'They Don't Need Probable Cause'

ICE agents handcuff and detain 71-year-old U.S. citizen

Elderly US Citizen Visited Immigration Court to 'Protect Refugees.' Then ICE Detained Her

Trump Mulled Pardoning Ghislaine Maxwell Over Worries She Would 'Say

Trump Considered Pardoning Epstein Accomplice Over Concerns She Would 'Say Anything' About His Relationship With Epstein, Author Claims