Ben & Jerry's GMO food label fight puts parent Unilever in a squeeze - pundits

By

When Vermont Governor Peter Shumlin signed the first state law in the US that requires corporations to label their food products made with ingredients from genetically-modified organisms, there was a person on his side who industry pundits said has caused a company to look stupid: Ben & Jerry's CEO Jostein Solheim.

Bloomberg said Ben & Jerry's has been a vocal supporter of the law, which was odd considering that its parent company, Unilever, along with some of the world's biggest food companies, has opposed to the idea of labeling their GMO-made products. But Solheim's appearance during the signing of the state law would backfire mostly on Unilever, who has remained nonchalant about the event.

Professor of nutrition and public health at New York University and "Food Politics" author Marion Nestle said, "In the short run, they might get away with ignoring what B&J is doing, but sooner or later it will catch up with them."

In June, a month after Shumlin had signed the law, the Grocery Manufacturers Association (GMA), and industry group of which Unilever is a member of, has sued Governor Shumlin and other state officials in the hopes of blocking the law to take into effect, which would be in July 2016. The lawsuit prompted Minnesota-based advocacy group Organic Consumers Association to renew a boycott of food brands they think are traitors, of which Ben & Jerry's is included, Bloomberg said.

However, Ben & Jerry's responded differently, and has somewhat launched into a campaign to promote GMO labeling.

Solheim challenged Unilever's response to the law, which had since blasted it as a violation of free speech. The Ben & Jerry's CEO said, "If it's a fad, then why have over 60 countries around the world adopted it? I don't think it's a fad that people want to know what's in their food. If you believe in a consumer's right to know, you have to promote that belief. You can't not take a stand."

On the other hand, Solheim dismisses assumptions that Unilever would damage its own popular brand. He claimed that Unilever does respect the ice cream company's push for GMO labeling. He added, "Obviously, there have been some bumps in the road, but our relationship is very productive."

On the other hand, Sanford C. Bernstein Andrew Wood believed that Unilever did not want to take that business risk. He said, "I don't think they will ever want the potentially massive negative PR of trying to silence B&J."

Tags
Ben & Jerry's, Unilever, Ben & Jerry's CEO Jostein Solheim, genetically-modified organisms
Join the Discussion
Related Articles
More Business News
IRS Announces $1 Billion Unclaimed 2020 Tax Refunds, Urges Taxpayers to Submit Tax Returns As Deadline Looms

IRS Announces $1 Billion Unclaimed 2020 Tax Refunds, Urges Taxpayers to Submit Tax Returns As Deadline Looms

Ohio Woman Sentenced for Massive Social Security Scam Involving Dead Child's Identity

Ohio Woman Sentenced for Massive Social Security Scam Involving Dead Child's Identity

NY Attorney General Letitia James Plans to Collect $454M by Freezing Trump's Bank Accounts, Properties

NY Attorney General Letitia James Plans to Collect $454M by Freezing Trump's Bank Accounts, Properties

Apple Faces US Antitrust Lawsuit Over Smartphone Monopolization, High Consumer Prices

Apple Faces US Antitrust Lawsuit Over Smartphone Monopolization, High Consumer Prices

Real Time Analytics