Star Athletica vs. Varsity Brands: Supreme Court Rules Copyright Protection Over Garment Design Elements

By

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled on Wednesday that some basic design elements in cheerleader uniform deserve copyright protection. The decision has placed the Varsity Brands Inc, top American maker of the garments on the winning side, with serious implications for the fashion industry.

Varsity is a dominant cheerleader uniform maker that has previously accused Star Athletica LLC of infringing five of its designs. The justices ruled 6-2 to uphold a lower court's 2015 ruling that allowed the lawsuit to proceed.

According to the Supreme Court's opinion, the high court conducted a test in two parts to determine if the design elements qualified for copyright protection. The justices then said the graphic, pictorial or sculptural features of the design should be mandatorily "separated" from any utilitarian object design.

As Varsity contends, the case centered on whether the zigzags, stripes, and chevrons that typify cheerleader uniforms can be copyrighted, or are essential to the purpose of the garment that they should not deserve such legal copyright protection. Without such decorations, a cheerleader uniform might look like a "little black dress," Star Athletica argued.

The features would also have to merit copyright protection independently. The opinion was released on the basis that Congress has given limited copyright protection to certain features of industrial design, despite Congress' intent to entirely exclude industrial design from copyright issues.

The court ruling said that approaching the statute with presumptive hostility toward protection for industrial design was the basis of undermining the decision. The opinion was written by Justice Clarence Thomas alongside Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Samuel Alito, Elena Kagan, and Sonia Sotomayor, according to Insurance Journal.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg concurred in the majority decisions but said she would not have applied a "separability" test. Meanwhile, Justices Stephen Breyer and Anthony Kennedy showed dissent towards the copyright protection, saying the elements are inseparable from the design.

Tags
U.S. Supreme Court

© 2025 Lawyer Herald All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.

Join the Discussion
More Law & Society
Miguel Mike Mirabal Discusses the Role of Integrity and Equity

Miguel Mike Mirabal Discusses the Role of Integrity and Equity in Global Legal Practice

Jan 6 DOJ Appointment_07022025_1

Trump Picks Pardoned Capitol Rioter Who Encouraged Violence Against Police to Serve as DOJ Adviser

Trump Revives Idea of Deporting Criminals ‘Born in Our Country’:

Trump Revives Idea of Deporting US Citizen Criminals 'We Ought to Get Them the Hell Out of Here'

Tennessee Man Used Drone to Deliver Marijuana to Inmate in

Michigan Bank Robber Coaxed Out of Standoff With Soda Dangling From Drone Before Police Shot Him